Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.2 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-15 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.17 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Aurora gray and Illusion Sky | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.26 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG Wing is much better than the Google Pixel 2, getting a general score of 91.2 against 81.6. LG Wing is a a lot newer phone than Google Pixel 2, although it is incredibly thicker and heavier. The Google Pixel 2 counts with a little bit better looking screen than LG Wing, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher pixel number in each display inch.
The LG Wing counts with a little better performance than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG Wing also has 4 GB more RAM. The LG Wing counts with a much bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 2, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity and a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG Wing counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity. LG Wing features a lot better camera than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same aperture, the LG Wing also has a lot higher resolution camera, a much larger sensor shooting much higher quality videos and photographs and higher video frame rates.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Google Pixel 2, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 2. If you are trying to save some money, you can get Google Pixel 2, and give up a couple features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.