Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.2 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-15 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 9.17 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Aurora gray and Illusion Sky | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.26 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG Wing has a score of 91.2, which is much better than the Google Pixel XL's overall score of 81.3. The LG Wing is a much newer phone than Google Pixel XL, although it is a lot heavier and way thicker. Google Pixel XL counts with a slightly better screen than LG Wing, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher display pixel density and a slightly higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
The LG Wing features a way bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel XL, because it has an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB and 256 GB internal memory capacity. The LG Wing features a bit more powerful CPU than Google Pixel XL, because it has a larger number of faster cores and 4 GB more RAM memory.
The LG Wing counts with a much better camera than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the LG Wing also has a larger aperture to capture better low-light images, higher 60 frames per second video frame rates, a back facing camera with a much higher resolution and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a way better image and video quality.
The LG Wing has a little better battery lifetime than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 16 percent larger battery capacity.
LG Wing costs more than the Google Pixel XL, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.