Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.2 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-10-15 | 2017-09-21 |
| 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 9.17 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Aurora gray and Illusion Sky | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | P-OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 20.26 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG Wing has a global score of 91.2, which is much better than the LG V30's 79.1 global score. LG Wing's construction is way newer, but extremely thicker and much heavier than the LG V30. LG Wing features just a bit better hardware performance than LG V30, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG Wing also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
LG V30 features a bit more vivid screen than LG Wing, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution and more pixels per inch of display. The LG Wing features a much better camera than LG V30, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for taking photographs in low light environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the LG Wing also counts with a lot bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, better 60 fps video frame rates and a lot higher resolution camera in the back.
LG Wing counts with a very superior memory for apps and games than LG V30, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB, the LG Wing also has 256 GB internal memory. The LG Wing counts with superior battery life than LG V30, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG V30, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG V30. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the LG Wing, but if you don't you can save some money and get the LG V30, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.