Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.2 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-10-15 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.17 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Aurora gray and Illusion Sky | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 20.26 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Wing is a little bit better than LG V50 ThinQ, getting a general score of 91.2 against 83.7. LG Wing's construction is newer, but way thicker and a lot heavier than LG V50 ThinQ. Both phones we compare here come with the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't perceive any differences regarding operating system features.
LG V50 ThinQ has a bit better hardware performance than LG Wing, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. LG V50 ThinQ has a slightly better screen than LG Wing, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels quantity in each inch in the screen and a higher 1440 x 3120px resolution.
The LG Wing has more storage capacity to store more games and applications than LG V50 ThinQ, and although they both have an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG Wing also has 128 GB more internal storage. The LG Wing counts with a lot better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not nice for taking pictures or videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same video resolution and the same 60 fps video frame rates, the LG Wing also counts with a much more MP camera and a much larger camera sensor capturing much higher quality photographs and videos.
The LG V50 ThinQ's battery duration is just as good as the battery lifetime in LG Wing.
Although LG Wing is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG V50 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG V50 ThinQ. If you want to save some money, you can get the LG V50 ThinQ, giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.