Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.2 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-10-15 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 9.17 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Aurora gray and Illusion Sky | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.26 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG Wing is much better than the Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, getting a score of 91.2 against 79.3. The LG Wing design is newer than the Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+'s, although it is thicker and extremely heavier. These devices use Android operating system, but LG Wing has newer 10 version while Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has Android 5.1 version.
The Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ features a sharper display than LG Wing, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a bit higher 2560 x 1440 resolution. The LG Wing features a better performing processing unit than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores (and also faster).
The LG Wing features a much bigger storage for apps and games than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity and an external memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. LG Wing counts with greater battery life than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
LG Wing has a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same video quality, the LG Wing also has a much larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a larger aperture to take better images and video in low-light situations, a way more mega-pixels back facing camera and higher video frame rates.
The LG Wing is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy S6 edge+, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.