Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.2 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Vivo |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-10-15 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 9.17 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Aurora gray and Illusion Sky | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1000.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 8 inches |
| 2460 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 395 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 20.26 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG Wing is better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, having a 91.2 score against 77.8. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the LG Wing has the older 10 version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14. Although LG Wing is a better cellphone than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it must be told that it is also a way older, thicker and somewhat heavier cellphone.
LG Wing features a way better hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 8 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much sharper screen than LG Wing, because it has a lot better resolution of 2200 x 2480, a bigger display and a little better screen pixels density.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures clearer pictures and videos than LG Wing, because although it has a camera with a way lower 50 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a way higher video resolution and a larger aperture. LG Wing features a greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way better battery duration than LG Wing, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Even being the best phone in our current comparison, the LG Wing is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.