Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| -- | 2017-10-19 |
| 5.87 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 is better than LG X Mach, having a global score of 81.6 against 73.5. The Google Pixel 2 is a just a little bit lighter and thinner phone than the LG X Mach. LG X Mach counts with a bit sharper screen than Google Pixel 2, because it has a just a bit greater pixel number per inch in the screen, a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a little bigger display.
The Google Pixel 2 counts with a bit more powerful CPU than LG X Mach, because it has more cpu cores and 1 GB more RAM memory. The LG X Mach has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 2, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The Google Pixel 2 has a superior camera than LG X Mach, although it has a back facing camera with a worse resolution and a lower 3840x2160 video quality. LG X Mach counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.