Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.87 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has a general score of 83.7, which is better than LG X Mach's 73.5 score. The LG V50 ThinQ is a somewhat heavier but just a little thinner cellphone than LG X Mach. The LG V50 ThinQ has a little better hardware performance than LG X Mach, because it has a higher number of cores and 3 GB more RAM memory.
The LG X Mach has a bit better screen than LG V50 ThinQ, although it has a little smaller screen, a little lower screen density and a bit lower resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. The LG V50 ThinQ features a very superior memory for applications and games than LG X Mach, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB, the LG V50 ThinQ also has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
LG V50 ThinQ features greater battery duration than LG X Mach, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. LG V50 ThinQ captures much better photographs and videos than LG X Mach, although it has a lower video quality and a lesser mega pixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.