Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| -- | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.87 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Blue |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo is a bit better than LG X Mach, getting a 77.9 score against 73.5. Even being the best we compare here, the Motorola DROID Turbo construction is a lot thicker and somewhat heavier than LG X Mach. Motorola DROID Turbo features a bit more vivid display than LG X Mach, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 2560 x 1440px, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with a quite higher screen density.
LG X Mach features a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB. Motorola DROID Turbo has a bit better processor than LG X Mach, because although it has lesser cpu cores , and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with an additional graphics co-processor.
Motorola DROID Turbo features a better camera than LG X Mach, because although it has worse 24 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with a back-facing camera with much more MP. Motorola DROID Turbo features superior battery duration than LG X Mach, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.