Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.87 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic indigo |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G Stylus is just a bit better than the LG X Mach, with a score of 79.7 against 73.5. Moto G Stylus is a just a bit thicker and notably heavier phone than LG X Mach. The LG X Mach has a better looking screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and more pixels per display inch.
Moto G Stylus counts with a bigger storage for games and applications than LG X Mach, because although it has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory. The Moto G Stylus has a bit more powerful processing unit than LG X Mach, because it has 1 GB more RAM memory and a greater number of faster cores.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus has superior battery life than LG X Mach, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. Moto G Stylus has a much better camera than LG X Mach, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Moto G Stylus also has a way higher 48 megapixels resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.