Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| -- | 2021-01-22 |
| 5.87 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 534 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.36 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 has a score of 84.7, which is much better than the LG X Mach's general score of 73.5. Despite being the best device in this review, the Galaxy A32 is a just a little bit thicker and noticeably heavier device than the LG X Mach. The Samsung Galaxy A32 has just a bit better performance than LG X Mach, because it has 2 more cpu cores and a higher amount of RAM memory.
LG X Mach features a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a lot better pixels amount per display inch and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. The Samsung Galaxy A32 features a much better camera than LG X Mach, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has a back-facing camera with a lot better 48 mega-pixels resolution.
The Galaxy A32 has a little bit more memory to store more apps and games than LG X Mach, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory. The Galaxy A32 features a way better battery performance than LG X Mach, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.