Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | 2018-10-20 |
| 5.87 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.36 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A7 (2018) is much better than LG X Mach, having a general score of 84.2 against 73.5. Galaxy A7 (2018) is a somewhat heavier but somewhat thinner phone than the LG X Mach. The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) features a bit better performance than LG X Mach, because it has a greater number of cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
The LG X Mach features a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixels density and a better 1440 x 2560px resolution. Galaxy A7 (2018) features a better camera than LG X Mach, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Galaxy A7 (2018) also has a much higher 24 mega pixels resolution back camera.
The Galaxy A7 (2018) counts with a greater storage to store more apps and games than LG X Mach, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 512 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Galaxy A7 (2018) counts with a bit superior battery performance than LG X Mach, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.