Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | 2019-05-29 |
| 5.87 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A80 is better than LG X Mach, having an 84.9 score against 73.5. Even being the best device we are comparing here, Galaxy A80 is a extremely heavier and just a little bit thicker device than LG X Mach. The Samsung Galaxy A80 has a bit better CPU than LG X Mach, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and a larger number of faster cores.
The LG X Mach features a more vivid display than Galaxy A80, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a greater quantity of pixels per screen inch. The LG X Mach features a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A80, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Galaxy A80 counts with better battery life than LG X Mach, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. The Galaxy A80 captures a lot better videos and photos than LG X Mach, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A80 also has a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.