Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| -- | 2019-09-04 |
| 5.87 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| -- | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A90 5G is a lot better than LG X Mach, with a 90.5 score against 73.5. The Galaxy A90 5G design is notably heavier but just a little bit thinner than the LG X Mach. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a little faster CPU than LG X Mach, because it has 3 GB more RAM memory and a larger number of faster cores.
The LG X Mach has a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a greater display density. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than LG X Mach, because although it has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features a superior battery lifetime than LG X Mach, because it has a 50 percent bigger battery size. The Galaxy A90 5G has a way better camera than LG X Mach, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A90 5G also has a way better 48 megapixels resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.