Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-09-29 |
| 5.87 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 12.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M30s is much better than the LG X Mach, having a score of 83.3 against 73.5. Galaxy M30s's design has the same thickness than LG X Mach, but it's heavier. The LG X Mach has a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy M30s, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better screen pixel density.
The Galaxy M30s features just a bit better performance than LG X Mach, because it has a higher amount of RAM and a higher number of faster cores. LG X Mach counts with a little bit more storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy M30s, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Galaxy M30s has a way better battery performance than LG X Mach, because it has a 6000mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh. The Samsung Galaxy M30s shoots much clearer pictures and videos than LG X Mach, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy M30s also has a lot more megapixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.