Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| -- | 2015-08-13 |
| 5.87 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gold and Gray |
| -- | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 8.82 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S6 edge+ is a bit better than the LG X Mach, having a overall score of 79.3 against 73.5. Galaxy S6 edge+'s body is a lot thinner but just a bit heavier than the LG X Mach. Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with a slightly better looking display than LG X Mach, because although it has a little bit inferior pixel amount in each inch in the display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 2560 x 1440px, the Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ also counts with a quite bigger display.
LG X Mach counts with a bit superior processing unit than Galaxy S6 edge+, because although it has lesser RAM memory, it also counts with 5 more processing cores. LG X Mach features a very superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S6 edge+, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+'s battery duration is just as good as LG X Mach's battery duration. The Galaxy S6 edge+ has a better camera than LG X Mach, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy S6 edge+ also has a camera with way more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.