Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| -- | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.87 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.82 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a score of 77.8, which is slightly better than LG X Mach's general score of 73.5. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a much thinner but incredibly heavier device than LG X Mach. The LG X Mach has a lot better processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less cpu cores and a lower amount of RAM memory.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a brighter screen than LG X Mach, because although it has a just a little lower pixels number in each inch in the screen, it also counts with a higher 2200 x 2480 resolution, much more brightness and a lot bigger screen. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better camera than LG X Mach, because it has a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality and a way higher 50 megapixels resolution camera in the back.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than LG X Mach, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 480 GB more internal memory. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way better battery life than LG X Mach, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.