Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Xiaomi |
| -- | 2018-08-29 |
| 5.87 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.33 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue and Red |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 534 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 400 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has an overall score of 85.5, which is much better than LG X Mach's 73.5 global score. Xiaomi Pocophone F1's design has the same thickness than the LG X Mach, but it's heavier. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a bit faster processor than LG X Mach, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and a greater number of faster cores.
The LG X Mach counts with a slightly better display than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has way less brightness and a little smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a higher pixel density. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a much better memory capacity to install games and applications than LG X Mach, because although it has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 256 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features improved battery lifetime than LG X Mach, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a very superior camera than LG X Mach, although it has a back camera with lesser MP and a worse video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.