Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.7 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Apple |
| Android 7.0 Nougat | -- |
| 2017-05-26 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.06 x 2.98 x 0.37 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.87 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black and Brown | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 110.00 | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 8940 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1400 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 505 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 8.55 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4100mAh Li - Ion Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone 8 is better than the LG X venture, with a score of 85 against 71.7. The iPhone 8 body is lighter and noticeably thinner than the LG X venture, even though they were released only 4 months apart. The iPhone 8 features a quite superior hardware performance than LG X venture, because although it has less CPU cores , and they both have a 2 GB RAM, the iPhone 8 also counts with a 64-bits processor.
IPhone 8 has a little sharper display than LG X venture, although it has a little bit inferior pixel number in each inch in the display, a much lower resolution of 750 x 1334 pixels and a bit smaller screen. The Apple iPhone 8 counts with a superior camera than LG X venture, because although it has a camera with a lot worse 12 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture for better photography and video in low-light situations and a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
The iPhone 8 features a slightly bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG X venture, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The LG X venture features a much longer battery performance than Apple iPhone 8, because it has a 4100mAh battery capacity instead of 1821mAh.
Although iPhone 8 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG X venture, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG X venture. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the LG X venture, and give up a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.