Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 56.5 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Meizu | LG |
| Android 4.4 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.52 x 2.84 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.52 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue, Green, Pink, White and Yellow | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 768 x 1280 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | OLED |
| 299 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6732 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A53 (Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.62 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GPRS | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 5.9 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has a global score of 83.7, which is much better than the Meizu Blue Charm's global score of 56.5. Both devices in our current comparison use Android OS (operating system), but the LG V50 ThinQ has a newer 10 version while Meizu Blue Charm has Android 4.4, giving a lot of extra features and performance optimizations. The LG V50 ThinQ construction is much heavier but just a little thinner than Meizu Blue Charm.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a little better hardware performance than Meizu Blue Charm, because although it has a 32 bits processor against 64-bits, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM and a larger number of cores. The LG V50 ThinQ has a little more vivid screen than Meizu Blue Charm, because it has a way higher 1440 x 3120px resolution, a bigger screen and a lot greater display density.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a way better camera than Meizu Blue Charm, because although it has a lower 12 megapixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a much better (4K) video resolution and a lot bigger aperture to capture better low light photography. LG V50 ThinQ features a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Meizu Blue Charm, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal storage capacity.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Meizu Blue Charm, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, the LG V50 ThinQ is also cheap compared to the other phone, which makes this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.