Compare phones
|
|
| Global Score | |
| 54.7 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Meizu | Samsung |
| Android 4.2 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2013-09-01 | 2020-06-19 |
| 5.47 x 2.83 x 0.36 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| -- | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1800 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 412 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 5410 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 1600 MHz + Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| IT PowerVR SGX544MP3 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.55 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.4 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.37 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.4 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2400mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 14 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.4 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G is much better than the Meizu MX3, with a 91.8 score against 54.7. Even though the Galaxy A71 5G is a lot heavier than Meizu MX3, it's somewhat thinner and also way newer. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A71 5G has a more recent 11 version and Meizu MX3 has Android 4.2, providing you some nice extra features and better performance.
Meizu MX3 has a bit better looking display than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1800 x 1080 pixels and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch in the screen. Galaxy A71 5G has a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Meizu MX3, because it has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory.
The Galaxy A71 5G features a little faster processor than Meizu MX3, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy A71 5G also has more RAM. The Galaxy A71 5G counts with a really longer battery life than Meizu MX3, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a very superior camera than Meizu MX3, because it has a much higher resolution camera in the back and a lot higher video definition.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also a bit cheaper, which makes it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.