Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 58.3 | 64.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Meizu | Nokia |
| -- | Windows Phone 8 |
| 2016-07-30 | 2012-09-05 |
| 6.05 x 2.96 x 0.29 inches | 5.13 x 2.79 x 0.42 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Gold, Gray, Pink and White | Black, Gray, Red, White and Yellow |
| Metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 300.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 4.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 768 x 1280 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 332 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.5 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X20 MT6797 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Single-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 1 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP4 GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 8.55 | 8.37 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 8.70 MP + 1.30 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 8.58 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 2.4 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3060mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 460 hours standby time 18.6 hours talk time |
| 5.04 | 3.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 3.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Lumia 920 has a score of 64.1, which is just a bit better than the Meizu MX6's 58.3 global score. Even being the best in our current comparison, we must highlight that it is also a way older, heavier and much thicker cellphone. The Lumia 920 counts with a bit sharper screen than Meizu MX6, because although it has a little worse pixels density, a quite smaller screen and a lot lower resolution of 1280 x 768px, it also counts with a bit more brightness.
Lumia 920's memory capacity for apps and games is very similar to the Meizu MX6 one, they have the same 32 GB internal storage capacity. Meizu MX6 counts with a little bit better processing power than Nokia Lumia 920, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor and less cpu cores , it also counts with more RAM memory.
Meizu MX6 has just a bit better camera than Nokia Lumia 920, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Meizu MX6 also has a much more mega-pixels back facing camera and a much better (4K) video quality. Meizu MX6 features a way better battery performance than Lumia 920, because it has a 53% more battery capacity.
Lumia 920 not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest one, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.