Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 66.7 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Meizu | Xiaomi |
| 2016-11-01 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.13 x 3.04 x 0.29 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.57 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Silver | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 435.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Samsung Exynos M1 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is much better than the Meizu PRO 6 Plus, with a global score of 85.5 against 66.7. Although the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is newer than the Meizu PRO 6 Plus, it is thicker and somewhat heavier. The Meizu PRO 6 Plus counts with a bit better screen than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen, a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a little brighter display.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a much better memory for apps and games than Meizu PRO 6 Plus, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 256 GB and 256 GB internal storage. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a little faster processor than Meizu PRO 6 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a bit better camera than Meizu PRO 6 Plus, and although they both have the same video quality and the same resolution camera in the back, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a bigger aperture, higher 60 fps video frame rate and a bigger sensor capturing higher quality photographs and videos.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with greater battery performance than Meizu PRO 6 Plus, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is also a bit cheaper, which makes this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.