Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 47.1 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Micromax | LG |
| Android 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.79 x 3.01 x 0.38 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 480 x 854 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 196 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6577 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Dual-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX531 (200 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 7.74 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 2 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 3.22 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.27 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 225 hours standby time 6 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is way better than the Micromax A110 Canvas 2, with a score of 83.7 against 47.1. Both of these phones use Android OS, but LG V50 ThinQ has 10 version while Micromax A110 Canvas 2 has Android 4.1 version, providing some extra features and performance improvements. The LG V50 ThinQ is a somewhat thinner but a little heavier phone than Micromax A110 Canvas 2.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much more vibrant screen than Micromax A110 Canvas 2, because it has a bigger display, a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and a way greater screen density. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a really superior performance than Micromax A110 Canvas 2, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with more RAM and a larger number of cores.
LG V50 ThinQ has a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Micromax A110 Canvas 2, because it has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB and 126 GB more internal storage capacity. The LG V50 ThinQ captures much better videos and photos than Micromax A110 Canvas 2, because it has a back camera with lot more megapixels.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a very superior battery duration than Micromax A110 Canvas 2, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
LG V50 ThinQ not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.