Compare phones
HTC Radar
4G T-Mobile| Global Score | |
| 49.3 | 54 |
| Basic Information | |
| Micromax | HTC |
| Android 4.1 | Windows Phone 7.5 Mango 7.5 Mango |
| 2013-01-21 | 2011-09-01 |
| -- | 4.74 x 2.42 x 0.43 inches |
| -- | 4.83 ounces |
| Black and White | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 199.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 3.8 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 480 x 800 pixels |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD |
| 294 pixels per inch | 246 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6589 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S2 MSM8255 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Scorpion (Single-Core 1000 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 512 MB (333 MHz) RAM |
| PowerVR 5XT GPU | Adreno 205 (245 MHz) GPU |
| 8.1 | 7.56 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 8 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 2.5 | 3.3 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution |
| 6.49 | 6.82 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM |
| SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 4.6 | 3.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1520mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 174 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | 480 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 3.92 | 3.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 2.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The HTC Radar has a general score of 54, which is a bit better than the Micromax A116 Canvas HD's overall score of 49.3. The HTC Radar works with Windows Phone 7.5 Mango 7.5 Mango OS, while Micromax A116 Canvas HD comes with Android 4.1 OS. Micromax A116 Canvas HD features a sharper display than HTC Radar, because it has a bit better screen density, a much better resolution of 1280 x 720 pixels and a much larger display.
HTC Radar features a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Micromax A116 Canvas HD, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Micromax A116 Canvas HD features a little better processing power than HTC Radar, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with a larger number of faster cores and a larger amount of RAM.
Micromax A116 Canvas HD counts with greater battery life than HTC Radar, because it has a 2000mAh battery capacity instead of 1520mAh. The HTC Radar shoots slightly better videos and photos than Micromax A116 Canvas HD, although it has a back-facing camera with lot less mega-pixels and a worse video definition.
The HTC Radar is not only the best devices in our comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.