Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 49.3 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Micromax | LG |
| Android 4.1 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2013-01-21 | 2019-05-10 |
| -- | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6589 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR 5XT GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.1 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 2.5 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.49 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 174 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has an overall score of 83.7, which is a lot better than the Micromax A116 Canvas HD's 49.3 global score. These devices come with Android OS (operating system), but the LG V50 ThinQ has the newer 10 version and Micromax A116 Canvas HD has Android 4.1, offering some additional features.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a greater performance than Micromax A116 Canvas HD, because it has more RAM and a larger number of cores (and also faster). The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit better looking display than Micromax A116 Canvas HD, because it has a much greater display density, a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px and a bigger display.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a very superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Micromax A116 Canvas HD, because it has more internal storage. LG V50 ThinQ shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Micromax A116 Canvas HD, because it has a back facing camera with way more MP and a much better video quality.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a way better battery duration than Micromax A116 Canvas HD, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
The LG V50 ThinQ is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheaper, making it easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.