Search


Compare phones

Global Score
35.238.4
Basic Information
MicromaxSamsung
Android 2.2--
--2009-03-10
4.22 x 2.31 x 0.53 inches4.09 x 2.09 x 0.47 inches
--3.25 ounces
$ 235.00$ 80.00
Display / Screen
2.8 inches3 inches
240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)240 x 400 pixels
--TFT
143 pixels per inch155 pixels per inch
No touch screenResistive
5.95.9
Single-Core 600 MHz processor processor
GPU GPU
6.755.76
Storage
153,6 MB internal memory51,2 MB internal memory
microSD, microSDHC external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC external memory slot
0.70.4
Camera
3.00 MP3.20 MP
--320 x 240 (15 fps) (QVGA) video resolution
5.065.39
Networks
Wi-Fi--
HSDPA, UMTS and GSMEDGE and GSM
SIMSIM
3.10.3
Battery Life
1000mAh Li-Ion Battery1000mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
144 hours standby time
4 hours talk time
800 hours standby time
10 hours talk time
2.562.56
Other Features
BluetoothBluetooth 2.1
GPS--
--Accelerometer
--FM Radio

Comparison review

The Samsung Star has a score of 38.4, which is just a bit better than Micromax A55's global score of 35.2. Samsung Star has a display that is just as good as Micromax A55's screen, although the Samsung Star also has a slightly higher resolution of 400 x 240, a bit larger screen and a bit higher pixel amount per inch of screen.

The Micromax A55 counts with a more powerful processing unit than Samsung Star, because it has 1 more cores. The Micromax A55 counts with a way bigger storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Star, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 102,4 MB more internal memory capacity.

The Samsung Star and Micromax A55 both have very similar battery durations. The Samsung Star has just a bit better camera than Micromax A55, because it has a camera with a better resolution.

Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Samsung Star is also a bargain compared to the other ones.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.