Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 42.2 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Micromax | |
| Android 2.3.6 | -- |
| -- | 2017-10-19 |
| 5.62 x 2.99 x 0.42 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 187 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6515M chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Single-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 7.38 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 112,64 MB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 1.92 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 3.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.06 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 280 hours standby time 7 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 XL has an overall score of 82.5, which is way better than Micromax A72 Canvas VIVA's 42.2 overall score. The Google Pixel 2 XL is a a lot thinner and just a little lighter cellphone than the Micromax A72 Canvas VIVA. The Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a lot better performance than Micromax A72 Canvas VIVA, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a higher number of cores.
The Google Pixel 2 XL features a much sharper screen than Micromax A72 Canvas VIVA, because it has a much greater pixels density, a much higher 1440 x 2880px resolution and a bigger display. Google Pixel 2 XL has a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Micromax A72 Canvas VIVA, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
The Google Pixel 2 XL features a superior battery life than Micromax A72 Canvas VIVA, because it has a 3520mAh battery size. The Google Pixel 2 XL has a much better camera than Micromax A72 Canvas VIVA, because it has a camera with a way better resolution.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Google Pixel 2 XL is also a bit cheaper, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.