Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 42.2 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Micromax | |
| Android 2.3.6 | -- |
| -- | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.62 x 2.99 x 0.42 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 187 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6515M chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Single-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 7.38 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 112,64 MB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 1.92 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 3.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.06 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 280 hours standby time 7 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 is way better than the Micromax A72 Canvas VIVA, getting a overall score of 80 against 42.2. The Google Pixel 3 design is way lighter and thinner than Micromax A72 Canvas VIVA. The Google Pixel 3 counts with a much powerful processing unit than Micromax A72 Canvas VIVA, because it has a larger number of cores and 3,5 GB more RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 3 counts with a much more vibrant screen than Micromax A72 Canvas VIVA, because it has a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels, a way better pixels density and a little bit larger screen. The Google Pixel 3 features a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Micromax A72 Canvas VIVA, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory.
The Google Pixel 3 counts with a superior battery duration than Micromax A72 Canvas VIVA, because it has a 46% more battery capacity. Google Pixel 3 has a way better camera than Micromax A72 Canvas VIVA, because it has a back-facing camera with much more megapixels.
Google Pixel 3 is a bit more expensive than the Micromax A72 Canvas VIVA, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.