Compare phones
Motorola DROID Turbo
32 GB Metalized Fiber| Global Score | |
| 42.2 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Micromax | Motorola |
| Android 2.3.6 | Android 4.4.4 |
| -- | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.62 x 2.99 x 0.42 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.42 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Gray and Red |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 187 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.7 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6515M chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Single-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 7.38 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 112,64 MB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 1.92 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 3.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 5.06 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.4 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 280 hours standby time 7 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo is a lot better than Micromax A72 Canvas VIVA, having a 76.4 score against 42.2. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola DROID Turbo has the newer 4.4.4 version while Micromax A72 Canvas VIVA has Android 2.3.6, so it counts with a lot of extra features. The Motorola DROID Turbo is a a little bit lighter phone than Micromax A72 Canvas VIVA, but both are 0.42inches thick.
The Motorola DROID Turbo has a much powerful processing unit than Micromax A72 Canvas VIVA, because it has an extra graphics co-processor, 2,5 GB more RAM and more cores. Motorola DROID Turbo features a much better looking display than Micromax A72 Canvas VIVA, because it has a much better 2560 x 1440 resolution, a way greater screen pixel density and a little bit larger screen.
Motorola DROID Turbo has much more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Micromax A72 Canvas VIVA, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 32 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Micromax A72 Canvas VIVA, because it has a 3900mAh battery size.
The Motorola DROID Turbo features a lot better camera than Micromax A72 Canvas VIVA, because it has a camera in the back with a much higher 20.7 MP resolution.
Motorola DROID Turbo is a little more expensive than Micromax A72 Canvas VIVA, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.