Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 42.2 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Micromax | Samsung |
| Android 2.3.6 | -- |
| -- | 2018-03-16 |
| 5.62 x 2.99 x 0.42 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 187 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6515M chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Single-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 7.38 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 112,64 MB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 1.92 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 3.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.06 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 280 hours standby time 7 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S9 has a global score of 83.3, which is much better than the Micromax A72 Canvas VIVA's general score of 42.2. The Samsung Galaxy S9 is a lighter and a lot thinner device than the Micromax A72 Canvas VIVA. Galaxy S9 counts with a much more vibrant display than Micromax A72 Canvas VIVA, because it has a much better 1440 x 2960px resolution, a way greater display density and a bigger display.
Samsung Galaxy S9 has a very superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Micromax A72 Canvas VIVA, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 400 GB and 64 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy S9 has a very superior processing power than Micromax A72 Canvas VIVA, because it has a higher number of faster cores and a greater amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Micromax A72 Canvas VIVA, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity against 2000mAh. Samsung Galaxy S9 captures much clearer photos and videos than Micromax A72 Canvas VIVA, because it has a way better 12 megapixels resolution camera.
Samsung Galaxy S9 costs a bit more money than Micromax A72 Canvas VIVA, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.