Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 40.9 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Micromax | |
| Android 2.3.5 | -- |
| -- | 2017-10-19 |
| 4.91 x 2.52 x 0.46 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.17 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 6 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 233 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon MSM7227A chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A5 (Single-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 256 MB (200 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 200 (128 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 7.38 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 133,12 MB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 1.92 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 4.73 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1400mAh Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 175 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.12 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 XL is way better than Micromax A87 NINJA 4.0, having an 82.5 score against 40.9. The Google Pixel 2 XL has a very superior processor than Micromax A87 NINJA 4.0, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with 3,75 GB more RAM and 7 more cpu cores.
The Google Pixel 2 XL has a more vivid display than Micromax A87 NINJA 4.0, because it has a lot better 1440 x 2880 resolution, a lot larger display and a much greater display pixels density. The Google Pixel 2 XL features a greater camera than Micromax A87 NINJA 4.0, because it has a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels.
The Google Pixel 2 XL features a much better storage for applications and games than Micromax A87 NINJA 4.0, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 127,87 GB more internal storage. Google Pixel 2 XL features a very superior battery duration than Micromax A87 NINJA 4.0, because it has a 151 percent more battery capacity.
Google Pixel 2 XL is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also cheaper than the Micromax A87 NINJA 4.0.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.