Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 40.9 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Micromax | |
| Android 2.3.5 | -- |
| -- | 2018-10-18 |
| 4.91 x 2.52 x 0.46 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.22 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 233 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon MSM7227A chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A5 (Single-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 256 MB (200 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 200 (128 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 7.38 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 133,12 MB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 1.92 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 4.73 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1400mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 175 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.12 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 is much better than the Micromax A87 NINJA 4.0, with an 80 score against 40.9. The Google Pixel 3 features a way better processing power than Micromax A87 NINJA 4.0, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with a greater number of cores (and faster) and a higher amount of RAM.
Google Pixel 3 has a more vivid display than Micromax A87 NINJA 4.0, because it has a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2160, a really larger display and a lot greater screen pixel density. The Google Pixel 3 takes much better videos and photos than Micromax A87 NINJA 4.0, because it has a camera in the back with way more megapixels.
The Google Pixel 3 has a much bigger storage to install applications and games than Micromax A87 NINJA 4.0, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 63,87 GB more internal storage capacity. The Google Pixel 3 has a very superior battery performance than Micromax A87 NINJA 4.0, because it has 2915mAh of battery capacity against 1400mAh.
The Google Pixel 3 costs a little more money than the Micromax A87 NINJA 4.0, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.