Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 40.9 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Micromax | Samsung |
| Android 2.3.5 | -- |
| -- | 2018-03-16 |
| 4.91 x 2.52 x 0.46 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 5.75 ounces |
| -- | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 233 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon MSM7227A chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A5 (Single-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 256 MB (200 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 200 (128 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 7.38 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 133,12 MB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 1.92 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 4.73 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1400mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 175 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.12 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S9 has a score of 83.3, which is a lot better than Micromax A87 NINJA 4.0's general score of 40.9. The Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with a much more vibrant screen than Micromax A87 NINJA 4.0, because it has a lot greater screen density, a way bigger screen and a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2960px.
Galaxy S9 counts with a way bigger memory to install games and applications than Micromax A87 NINJA 4.0, because it has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 400 GB and more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy S9 counts with a very superior processor than Micromax A87 NINJA 4.0, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with a greater number of cores (and they are faster) and a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy S9 has a very superior camera than Micromax A87 NINJA 4.0, because it has a back camera with a lot better 12 MP resolution. Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with a superior battery life than Micromax A87 NINJA 4.0, because it has a 114% greater battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 costs a bit more money than Micromax A87 NINJA 4.0, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.