Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 42 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Micromax | |
| Android 4.0 | -- |
| -- | 2017-10-19 |
| -- | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.17 ounces |
| Black | Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 6 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 233 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek MT6577 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Dual-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX531 (200 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 7.74 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 1.32 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 3.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.06 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1450mAh Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 170 hours standby time 4 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.2 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 XL is way better than Micromax A89 Ninja, having a overall score of 82.5 against 42. Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a brighter screen than Micromax A89 Ninja, because it has a much better number of pixels per inch in the screen, a way higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and a way larger display.
The Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a better CPU than Micromax A89 Ninja, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM and a greater number of faster cores. The Google Pixel 2 XL features a very superior memory for games and applications than Micromax A89 Ninja, although it has no slot for an SD memory card.
The Google Pixel 2 XL captures much clearer photographs and videos than Micromax A89 Ninja, because it has a way higher 12.2 MP resolution camera in the back. Google Pixel 2 XL features a much longer battery lifetime than Micromax A89 Ninja, because it has 3520mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Google Pixel 2 XL is also cheap compared to the other phone, which makes buying this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.