Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 42 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Micromax | |
| Android 4.0 | -- |
| -- | 2018-10-18 |
| -- | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 5.22 ounces |
| Black | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 233 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek MT6577 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Dual-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX531 (200 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 7.74 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 1.32 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 3.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.06 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1450mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 170 hours standby time 4 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.2 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 is way better than Micromax A89 Ninja, getting an 80 score against 42. The Google Pixel 3 has a sharper display than Micromax A89 Ninja, because it has a lot larger display, a much higher pixel number per inch of screen and a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2160. The Google Pixel 3 features a much better hardware performance than Micromax A89 Ninja, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with more RAM and a larger number of cores.
The Google Pixel 3 has a much better camera than Micromax A89 Ninja, because it has a back-facing camera with a much better resolution. The Google Pixel 3 counts with a much greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Micromax A89 Ninja, although it has no SD card slot.
The Google Pixel 3 has a really longer battery lifetime than Micromax A89 Ninja, because it has a 2915mAh battery size against 1450mAh.
Google Pixel 3 costs a bit more than the Micromax A89 Ninja, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.