Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 45.1 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Micromax | LG |
| Android 4.0 | -- |
| -- | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.01 x 2.63 x 0.39 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 4.18 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 217 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6577A chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Dual-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX531 (200 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 7.74 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 2 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 3.22 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 5.83 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1600mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 180 hours standby time 5.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has an overall score of 81.3, which is much better than the Micromax A90S Superfone Pixel's 45.1 overall score. The LG V35 ThinQ design is incredibly heavier but way thinner than Micromax A90S Superfone Pixel. The LG V35 ThinQ has a much faster CPU than Micromax A90S Superfone Pixel, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with more RAM and 6 more cpu cores.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a much better looking screen than Micromax A90S Superfone Pixel, because it has a really larger display, a much higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a much higher pixel density. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a way better camera than Micromax A90S Superfone Pixel, because it has a much better video definition and a much higher 16 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera.
LG V35 ThinQ features a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Micromax A90S Superfone Pixel, because it has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal storage capacity. LG V35 ThinQ has a superior battery life than Micromax A90S Superfone Pixel, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity instead of 1600mAh.
LG V35 ThinQ costs a little more than the Micromax A90S Superfone Pixel, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.