Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 43.4 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Micromax | Samsung |
| Android 4.2.2 | -- |
| -- | 2018-03-16 |
| -- | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 5.75 ounces |
| Black | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 480 x 854 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 218 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Broadcom BCM21663 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Dual-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 7.56 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 1,5 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.02 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.83 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1800mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 350 hours standby time 7 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S9 is way better than Micromax Bolt A69, having a general score of 83.3 against 43.4. The Galaxy S9 has a lot better looking screen than Micromax Bolt A69, because it has a lot higher screen pixel density, a larger display and a lot better 1440 x 2960 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy S9 features a much better performing CPU than Micromax Bolt A69, because it has a larger number of faster cores and a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy S9 counts with a way bigger memory for applications and games than Micromax Bolt A69, because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and a SD memory slot that allows up to 400 GB. Galaxy S9 counts with a superior battery lifetime than Micromax Bolt A69, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy S9 counts with a way better camera than Micromax Bolt A69, because it has a much higher 3840x2160 video definition and a much more megapixels back-facing camera.
The Galaxy S9 costs a bit more money than Micromax Bolt A69, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.