Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 53.5 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Micromax | LG |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-10 |
| -- | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Aurora black |
| Aluminium | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6592 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Octa-Core 1700 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-450 MP4 (700 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.04 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 210 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is way better than Micromax Canvas 4 plus, with a global score of 83.7 against 53.5. Both devices in this comparison review work with Android OS (operating system), but the LG V50 ThinQ has the older 10 version while Micromax Canvas 4 plus has Android 4.4.2. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a little better performance than Micromax Canvas 4 plus, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, and they both have 8 cpu cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also counts with more RAM.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a little bit better looking display than Micromax Canvas 4 plus, because it has a way higher 1440 x 3120 resolution, a way higher amount of pixels per inch of display and a larger screen. LG V50 ThinQ shoots way better pictures and videos than Micromax Canvas 4 plus, because although it has a camera in the back with less MP, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Micromax Canvas 4 plus, because it has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage. The LG V50 ThinQ features a much better battery performance than Micromax Canvas 4 plus, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, LG V50 ThinQ is also cheap compared to the Micromax Canvas 4 plus, which makes this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.