Compare phones
|
|
| Global Score | |
| 46.1 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Micromax | |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| -- | 2018-10-18 |
| -- | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.49 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 480 x 854 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 218 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6582M chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP2 (416 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 1.32 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.94 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1900mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 180 hours standby time 6 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.76 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL has an overall score of 80.7, which is a lot better than the Micromax Canvas Fire's 46.1 global score. Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a more powerful processor than Micromax Canvas Fire, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with 3 GB more RAM and more CPU cores.
Google Pixel 3 XL has a brighter screen than Micromax Canvas Fire, because it has a way higher pixel number per inch of display, a way better resolution of 1440 x 2960px and a much larger screen. The Google Pixel 3 XL has a lot bigger storage to install games and applications than Micromax Canvas Fire, although it has no slot for external memory cards.
The Google Pixel 3 XL shoots much better photos and videos than Micromax Canvas Fire, because it has a back camera with way more mega pixels. The Google Pixel 3 XL features a very superior battery life than Micromax Canvas Fire, because it has an 81 percent bigger battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, Google Pixel 3 XL is also a bit cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.