Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 57.8 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Micromax | LG |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-10 |
| -- | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.46 ounces |
| Gold | Aurora black |
| Aluminium | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6592T chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-450 (650 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 25 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.62 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.15 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 210 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has a general score of 83.7, which is way better than Micromax Canvas Gold's 57.8 score. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V50 ThinQ has older 10 version and Micromax Canvas Gold has Android 4.4.2. The Micromax Canvas Gold has a little more vivid screen than LG V50 ThinQ, although it has a much worse pixels number per inch of display, a bit smaller display and a much lower resolution of 1920 x 1080.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit superior processing unit than Micromax Canvas Gold, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, and they both have the same number of cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also counts with more RAM. The LG V50 ThinQ features a superior memory to install applications and games than Micromax Canvas Gold, because it has 103 GB more internal memory and a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V50 ThinQ shoots much better photos and videos than Micromax Canvas Gold, although it has a back facing camera with much less mega pixels. LG V50 ThinQ has a much better battery duration than Micromax Canvas Gold, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 2300mAh.
LG V50 ThinQ not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.