Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 56.2 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Micromax | LG |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| -- | 2018-06-08 |
| -- | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| -- | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6592T chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Octa-Core 1700 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-450 MP4 (700 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 25 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.26 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2350mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 175 hours standby time 7.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is much better than the Micromax Canvas Knight, with a general score of 81.3 against 56.2. The LG V35 ThinQ features a bit better hardware performance than Micromax Canvas Knight, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, and they both have the same number of cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a higher amount of RAM.
Micromax Canvas Knight has a bit sharper display than LG V35 ThinQ, although it has a bit smaller screen, a way worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a just a little worse display density. LG V35 ThinQ features a superior storage for apps and games than Micromax Canvas Knight, because it has 39 GB more internal memory and a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much better battery performance than Micromax Canvas Knight, because it has a 40% larger battery capacity. LG V35 ThinQ features a greater camera than Micromax Canvas Knight, and although they both have a camera in the back with a 16 MP resolution, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a much higher 3840x2160 video definition.
The LG V35 ThinQ costs a bit more money than Micromax Canvas Knight, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.