Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 48.4 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Micromax | LG |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-10 |
| -- | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue and White | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 200 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6582M chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP2 (416 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 1.32 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.26 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2350mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 210 hours standby time 8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is a lot better than the Micromax Canvas L, having a global score of 83.7 against 48.4. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but the LG V50 ThinQ has the previous 10 version and Micromax Canvas L has Android 4.4.2 version. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a better screen than Micromax Canvas L, because it has a much better 1440 x 3120px resolution, a bigger screen and way more pixels per inch in the display.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a quite better hardware performance than Micromax Canvas L, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with a larger number of cores (and they are faster) and more RAM. The LG V50 ThinQ has a much better memory capacity to install games and applications than Micromax Canvas L, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a lot better camera than Micromax Canvas L, because it has a way more mega pixels back camera and a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution. The LG V50 ThinQ has a really longer battery life than Micromax Canvas L, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2350mAh.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, LG V50 ThinQ is also a bit cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.