Compare phones
|
|
| Global Score | |
| 53.5 | 74.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Micromax | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2019-10-16 |
| -- | 6.23 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.70 ounces |
| Blue and White | Cosmic Purple, Moonlight White, Nebula Purple, Neptune Blue and Space Black |
| -- | Glass and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 219.00 | $ 227.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 294 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6592 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Octa-Core 1700 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-450 MP4 (700 MHz) GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 1.32 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 320 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 has a score of 74.6, which is way better than Micromax Canvas Nitro's 53.5 general score. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 has an older 10 version while Micromax Canvas Nitro has Android 4.4.2 version. The Micromax Canvas Nitro has just a bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8, because although it has lesser RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Micromax Canvas Nitro also counts with an additional graphics processing unit.
Micromax Canvas Nitro counts with a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 8, although it has a much smaller display, a way lower resolution of 1280 x 720px and a much lower pixel amount per inch of screen. Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Micromax Canvas Nitro, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 128 GB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 has a very superior battery life than Micromax Canvas Nitro, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 captures way better photographs and videos than Micromax Canvas Nitro, because it has a larger camera aperture to take better captures in low light situations, a camera with a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution and a lot higher 3840x2160 video quality.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 costs a bit more than Micromax Canvas Nitro, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.