Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 46.5 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Micromax | Samsung |
| Android 4.1 | -- |
| -- | 2018-03-16 |
| -- | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 5.75 ounces |
| -- | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 480 x 854 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 196 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MTK6582 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 1,14 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 2.82 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.5 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 450 hours standby time 13.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S9 is a lot better than Micromax Canvas Power, having an 83.3 score against 46.5. Samsung Galaxy S9 features a superior processor than Micromax Canvas Power, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with more processing cores and more RAM memory.
The Galaxy S9 has a much more vibrant screen than Micromax Canvas Power, because it has a lot better number of pixels per inch in the display, a bigger display and a way higher 1440 x 2960 resolution. Galaxy S9 counts with a way bigger memory to store more apps and games than Micromax Canvas Power, because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and a SD extension slot that admits up to 400 GB.
Micromax Canvas Power counts with better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh. The Samsung Galaxy S9 has a way better camera than Micromax Canvas Power, because it has a lot more megapixels camera in the back and a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S9 costs a bit more money than the Micromax Canvas Power, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.