Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 50.7 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Micromax | LG |
| Android 4.2.2 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-10 |
| -- | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 312 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek MT6582 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (533 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.55 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.26 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1800mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 180 hours standby time 6.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is much better than Micromax Canvas Turbo Mini, with an 83.7 score against 50.7. Both devices in our current comparison work with Android OS, but LG V50 ThinQ has 10 version and Micromax Canvas Turbo Mini has Android 4.2.2. The LG V50 ThinQ features a quite better processing power than Micromax Canvas Turbo Mini, because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, it also counts with a greater number of cores (and also faster) and more RAM.
LG V50 ThinQ features a bit better looking display than Micromax Canvas Turbo Mini, because it has a really bigger display, a lot better pixels count per inch of display and a much higher 1440 x 3120 resolution. LG V50 ThinQ has a superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Micromax Canvas Turbo Mini, because it has 124 GB more internal storage capacity and a SD memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a way better camera than Micromax Canvas Turbo Mini, because it has a lot better video quality and a lot higher resolution back-facing camera. LG V50 ThinQ features a much better battery life than Micromax Canvas Turbo Mini, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 1800mAh.
Even being the best phone in our comparison, the LG V50 ThinQ is also a bit cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.