Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 47.9 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Micromax | Samsung |
| Android 4.2 | -- |
| -- | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.50 x 3.31 x 0.41 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| -- | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 184 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek MT6582 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP2 (416 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.26 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE and GPRS | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 1.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2450mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 209 hours standby time 9.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.4 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S9 has a global score of 83.3, which is much better than the Micromax Canvas XL's overall score of 47.9. Galaxy S9 is a just a bit lighter and thinner phone than the Micromax Canvas XL. Galaxy S9 has a superior performance than Micromax Canvas XL, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM and a higher number of faster cores.
Galaxy S9 counts with an incredibly better looking screen than Micromax Canvas XL, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a much greater pixel count per inch of display and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2960px. Galaxy S9 counts with a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Micromax Canvas XL, because it has a SD card slot that supports up to 400 GB and 60 GB more internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with longer battery duration than Micromax Canvas XL, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity against 2450mAh. Galaxy S9 has a lot better camera than Micromax Canvas XL, because it has a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels and a much better (4K) video quality.
Samsung Galaxy S9 costs a little more than the Micromax Canvas XL, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.