Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 47.1 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Micromax | LG |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-10 |
| -- | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.46 ounces |
| White | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 200 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6589M chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| werVR SGX544MP GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.1 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 1,43 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 3.02 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (15 fps) (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.49 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 255 hours standby time 8.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is much better than Micromax Canvas XL2, getting an 83.7 score against 47.1. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V50 ThinQ has the older 10 version and Micromax Canvas XL2 has Android 4.4.2. The LG V50 ThinQ has a faster CPU than Micromax Canvas XL2, because it has a higher number of cores (and faster) and a higher amount of RAM memory.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a sharper screen than Micromax Canvas XL2, because it has a bigger display, a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 and a lot better pixel number per inch of screen. The LG V50 ThinQ features a greater camera than Micromax Canvas XL2, because it has a camera with much more megapixels and a way higher (4K) video definition.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much greater storage capacity to install games and applications than Micromax Canvas XL2, because it has an external memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. The LG V50 ThinQ has a superior battery lifetime than Micromax Canvas XL2, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 2500mAh.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, LG V50 ThinQ is also cheaper than the Micromax Canvas XL2, which makes it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.