Compare phones
|
|
| Global Score | |
| 49.6 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Micromax | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| -- | 2019-03-15 |
| 5.21 x 2.54 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Blue and Gray | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 480 x 854 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 218 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6582V/X chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Quad-Core 1300 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.62 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.94 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1950mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 240 hours standby time 7 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.84 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 is much better than the Micromax Canvas Xpress, having an 83.8 score against 49.6. Samsung Galaxy A50 is a somewhat thinner but somewhat heavier phone than Micromax Canvas Xpress. Samsung Galaxy A50 features a superior processing unit than Micromax Canvas Xpress, because it has a higher number of cores (and they are faster) and a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy A50 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Micromax Canvas Xpress, because it has a much better 1080 x 2340px resolution, a way greater pixel density and a lot bigger screen. The Galaxy A50 features much more storage capacity for applications and games than Micromax Canvas Xpress, because it has 128 GB internal storage and an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy A50 counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Micromax Canvas Xpress, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 1950mAh. The Samsung Galaxy A50 features a way better camera than Micromax Canvas Xpress, because it has a much higher video definition and a much more megapixels camera.
Galaxy A50 costs a little more money than the Micromax Canvas Xpress, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.