Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 47.3 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Micromax | |
| Android 4.2.2 | -- |
| -- | 2017-10-19 |
| -- | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| -- | 6.17 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 480 x 854 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 218 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Broadcom BCM23550 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.01 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 3.82 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.93 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1800mAh Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 150 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.68 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 XL has a score of 82.5, which is a lot better than the Micromax MAd A94's global score of 47.3. Google Pixel 2 XL has a superior processing unit than Micromax MAd A94, because it has a higher amount of RAM and a higher number of faster cores. The Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a brighter display than Micromax MAd A94, because it has a way larger screen, much more pixels per inch of display and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels.
The Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a very superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Micromax MAd A94, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Google Pixel 2 XL takes way better videos and photos than Micromax MAd A94, because it has a camera in the back with much more megapixels and a much better 3840x2160 video quality.
Google Pixel 2 XL counts with a really longer battery performance than Micromax MAd A94, because it has a 3520mAh battery capacity against 1800mAh.
The Google Pixel 2 XL is not only the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also cheap compared to the other phone, making it a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.